After 10 years of refusing to release key data from its analysis of the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has published a new FAQ on its website defending its ludicrous position that the release of this data “might jeopardize public safety.”
The ASCE has good reason to fear scrutiny given the role they played in promulgating the official story, Angle adds. Not only did they give their tacit stamp of approval to the destruction of forensic evidence at Ground Zero but they also contributed to FEMA’s fatally flawed 2002 “World Trade Center Building Performance Study” and to their publication of deceptive peer-reviewed papers on the towers’ destruction by Zdeněk Bažant.
Architects and Engineers For 9/11 Truth know there is something deeply wrong when the US institutions of government, charged with the safety and well-being of all its citizens, are not able to act on facts brought to their attention which reveal evidence of criminality at work in Government institutions, at all levels, which continues to this day.
As it happens, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) limited the scope of its investigation to “the sequence of events from the instant of aircraft impact to the initiation of collapse.” Stunningly, NIST admitted that it conducted “little analysis of the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached” and that it was “unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse.”
UAF, AE911Truth Release All Data from WTC 7 Study — Time for NIST to Do the Same AE911Truth, Originaly Published October 15, 2019 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is pleased to announce the release of all input data, results … Continued