The ramifications of this report are massive.
The US Government, CIA, FBI, ‘Homeland Security’ have been aware of exactly what was done, who did it and refused to act.
Even to this day
Transcript Available: On this week’s episode of 9/11 Free Fall, host Andy Steele is joined by Mick Harrison and John O’Kelly of the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry to discuss the latest developments in two major cases: the petition for a federal grand jury investigation, which the Lawyers’ Committee first filed in April 2018, and the FBI 9/11 Review Commission lawsuit filed last March.
On this week’s episode of 9/11 Free Fall, host Andy Steele is joined by 9/11 scholar Graeme MacQueen to look back on his seminal 2006 paper, “118 Witnesses: The Firefighters’ Testimony to Explosions in the Twin Towers,” and his more recent book, The 2001 Anthrax Deception, which examines the connection between 9/11 and the 2001 anthrax attacks.
After 10 years of refusing to release key data from its analysis of the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has published a new FAQ on its website defending its ludicrous position that the release of this data “might jeopardize public safety.”
The ASCE has good reason to fear scrutiny given the role they played in promulgating the official story, Angle adds. Not only did they give their tacit stamp of approval to the destruction of forensic evidence at Ground Zero but they also contributed to FEMA’s fatally flawed 2002 “World Trade Center Building Performance Study” and to their publication of deceptive peer-reviewed papers on the towers’ destruction by Zdeněk Bažant.
Architects and Engineers For 9/11 Truth know there is something deeply wrong when the US institutions of government, charged with the safety and well-being of all its citizens, are not able to act on facts brought to their attention which reveal evidence of criminality at work in Government institutions, at all levels, which continues to this day.
As it happens, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) limited the scope of its investigation to “the sequence of events from the instant of aircraft impact to the initiation of collapse.” Stunningly, NIST admitted that it conducted “little analysis of the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached” and that it was “unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse.”
UAF, AE911Truth Release All Data from WTC 7 Study — Time for NIST to Do the Same AE911Truth, Originaly Published October 15, 2019 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth is pleased to announce the release of all input data, results … Continued