FBI Opposes Thorough Investigation of New 9/11 Atrocity Evidence

Transcript Available: On this week’s episode of 9/11 Free Fall, host Andy Steele is joined by Mick Harrison and John O’Kelly of the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry to discuss the latest developments in two major cases: the petition for a federal grand jury investigation, which the Lawyers’ Committee first filed in April 2018, and the FBI 9/11 Review Commission lawsuit filed last March.

911 And The 2001 Anthrax Deception

On this week’s episode of 9/11 Free Fall, host Andy Steele is joined by 9/11 scholar Graeme MacQueen to look back on his seminal 2006 paper, “118 Witnesses: The Firefighters’ Testimony to Explosions in the Twin Towers,” and his more recent book, The 2001 Anthrax Deception, which examines the connection between 9/11 and the 2001 anthrax attacks.

ASCE Threats Reveal Growing Fear of Project [9/11] Due Diligence Message

The ASCE has good reason to fear scrutiny given the role they played in promulgating the official story, Angle adds. Not only did they give their tacit stamp of approval to the destruction of forensic evidence at Ground Zero but they also contributed to FEMA’s fatally flawed 2002 “World Trade Center Building Performance Study” and to their publication of deceptive peer-reviewed papers on the towers’ destruction by Zdeněk Bažant.

Help AE911Truth and Dylan Avery Make the Ultimate Building 7 Documentary

Architects and Engineers For 9/11 Truth know there is something deeply wrong when the US institutions of government, charged with the safety and well-being of all its citizens, are not able to act on facts brought to their attention which reveal evidence of criminality at work in Government institutions, at all levels, which continues to this day.

WTC ‘Collapses’: New Paper Refutes Official Theory

As it happens, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) limited the scope of its investigation to “the sequence of events from the instant of aircraft impact to the initiation of collapse.” Stunningly, NIST admitted that it conducted “little analysis of the structural behavior of the tower after the conditions for collapse initiation were reached” and that it was “unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse.”