NTKP Note: The case for high court Jury Trial REFORM
If any court case illustrates the disconnect between natural justice and the ‘justice’ meted out by Judge Swift it is this. This case is not complex and were it heard in front of a jury the outcome would be different.
The judges view that the parents were not capable of interpreting the Office of National Statistics (ONS) data about deaths and injuries caused by the Covid-19 injection experiments on the UK’s children is a display of crass arrogance which demands High Court reform. Had a jury of the parents peers heard this case the outcome could very well have been different. The High Court must have jury trials to hear cases where the rights of all parents to inform themselves about the states policies, motives and consequences are being DENIED.
High Court Judge decides Parents do not need to know number of kids who’ve died due to the Covid-19 Vaccine because they’re too stupid to understand the data
Parents have been denied the right to know the rate of adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccination in children.
A High Court judge in the UK has sided with government policy to keep secret the number of children who have suffered adverse reactions—including any who have died—as a result of having the vaccine.
The Exposé is now heavily censored by Google, Facebook, Twitter and PayPal. Let’s not lose touch, subscribe today to receive the latest news from The Exposé in your inbox…
A mother, identified only as EF, had asked the UK’s Office of National Statistics (ONS) to release the data so that parents can make an informed decision about having their child vaccinated. After the ONS refused, EF took legal action to force it to reveal the numbers, and she has been supported in her campaign by TV presenter Beverley Turner, who helped raise £100,000 to pay legal costs.
But Mr Justice Jonathan Swift denied the application, arguing that parents did not have the ability to properly interpret the data. “Correlation does not equal causation, and the ONS information is not necessary to decide that claim.”
EF, who has two daughters aged 13 and 16, and so are eligible to have the Covid vaccine. said: “None of them want to take the vaccine. We have no information. They can’t tell us if the jabs cause cancer or blindness and until we know, how can we make a properly informed decision?”
After reviewing the safety data, the UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation had recommended against vaccinating children and young adolescents but had been over-ruled by the UK’s four chief medical officers.
According to the UK’s Yellow Card system—a voluntary scheme where doctors log suspected drug and vaccine side effects—there had been 2,546 reports of adverse reactions among the under-18s up to December 22nd last. It is estimated the scheme captures just 10 percent of adverse reactions and side effects.
We’re not funded by the Government
to publish lies and propaganda on their
behalf like the mainstream media.
Instead we rely solely on your support, so
please support us in our efforts to bring you
honest, reliable, investigative journalism.
It’s quick and easy…
Please choose your preferred
method to show your support
The Expose Monero Wallet Address –